MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Eosinophilic Esophagitis Is the Leading Cause of Food Bolus Impaction Requiring Endoscopy in Calgary, Canada

2017· article· en· W2914919337 on OpenAlexaffabout
Joel David, Eldon A. Shaffer, Christopher N. Andrews, Milli Gupta

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEosinophilic Esophagitis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryAlberta Health Services
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEosinophilic esophagitisDysphagiaEndoscopyImpactionEsophagusPopulationEsophagitisForeign bodyEmergency departmentGeneral surgeryInternal medicineGastroenterologySurgeryDiseaseReflux

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), a known cause of dysphagia, is increasingly associated with foreign body/food impaction (FBI), requiring urgent endoscopic removal in children and adults. This study examines the prevalence of EoE in patients requiring FB removal in Calgary and its surrounding areas. Methods: A retrospective review of all emergency (ER) and urgent care FB presentations from November 2015 to September 2016 in a population of approximately 1.2 million people was performed using the regional electronic health database. Patient's age, sex, clinical impression, endoscopy, and pathology was collected in agreement with local research ethics (ARECCI) guidelines. Results: A total of 334 patients presented with symptoms of FBI. 131 patients were excluded: 100 had FB that spontaneously resolved without a GI assessment and 31 had non-GI concerns (e.g. drug overdose, allergic reaction, psychosis, and seizures). The remaining 203 patients underwent gastroscopy (EGD). Their average age was 39 ± 14 years; the majority were male (M: F ratio was 133:70). EoE was identified in 35% of all EGDs; 65% had other esophageal disorders (Figure 1). For the 72 patients in whom EoE was endoscopically evident, 22% were known cases of EoE whereas 78% underwent subsequent confirmation with biopsies. Biopsies were not performed in those with an endoscopically normal esophagus or a Schatzki's ring (Figure 1). A minority of patients (35%) with EoE features had a biopsy at the initial endoscopy (Table 1). Of the EoE cases, 9 patients (4 previously known and 5 new cases) had experienced more than one episode of FBI. The most common management in ER was to prescribe PPIs and repeat an EGD as an outpatient (90%). Those with a prior history of FBI or EoE were more likely to be prescribed budesonide plus PPI. The remaining 10% were scheduled for follow-up only.Figure: Esophageal findings in documented food bolus impaction in 203 patients.Table: Table. Patient demographics and eosinophilic esophagitis related informationConclusion: EoE is the most common cause (35%) of FBI necessitating urgent endoscopic removal in Calgary. As mucosal biopsies were not taken from all patients with FBI, the true incidence of EoE is likely underestimated. Education and better follow-up are needed for the 12.5% (9/72) of patients that frequented ER for >1 episode of FBI. Given the rate of detection in ER, obtaining biopsies at the preliminary EGD for FBI should become a standard of practice for early detection and diagnosis of EoE.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score0.089

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Journal of GastroenterologySame topicEosinophilic EsophagitisFrench-language works237,207