MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2914939462 · doi:10.1109/cdc.2018.8619725

Asymptotic Reverse-Waterfilling Characterization of Nonanticipative Rate Distortion Function of Vector-Valued Gauss-Markov Processes with MSE Distortion

2018· article· en· W2914939462 on OpenAlexaff
Photios A. Stavrou, Themistoklis Charalambous, Charalambos D. Charalambous, Sergey Loyka, Mikael Skoglund

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWater Systems and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersStiftelsen för Strategisk Forskning
KeywordsDistortion (music)Characterization (materials science)Markov chainMarkov processGaussFunction (biology)AlgorithmMathematicsRate distortionComputer scienceApplied mathematicsMathematical optimizationStatisticsPhysicsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We analyze the asymptotic nonanticipative rate distortion function (NRDF) of vector-valued Gauss-Markov processes subject to a mean-squared error (MSE) distortion function. We derive a parametric characterization in terms of a reverse-waterfilling algorithm, that requires the solution of a matrix Riccati algebraic equation (RAE). Further, we develop an algorithm reminiscent of the classical reverse-waterfilling algorithm that provides an upper bound to the optimal solution of the reverse-waterfilling optimization problem, and under certain cases, it operates at the NRDF. Moreover, using the characterization of the reverse-waterfilling algorithm, we derive the analytical solution of the NRDF, for a simple two-dimensional parallel Gauss-Markov process. The efficacy of our proposed algorithm is demonstrated via an example.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.410
Threshold uncertainty score0.513

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWater Systems and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207