MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2915046578 · doi:10.7189/jogh.09.010303

Strengthening health research capacity to address adolescent fertility in Northeast Brazil

2019· review· en· W2915046578 on OpenAlexaff
Saionara Maria Aires da Câmara, Tetine Sentell, Diego G. Bassani, Marlos Rodrigues Domingues, Catherine M. Pirkle

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Global Health · 2019
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlobal Maternal and Child Health
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
FundersFogarty International CenterNational Institutes of HealthNational Institute on Minority Health and Health DisparitiesUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte
KeywordsFertilityMEDLINEEnvironmental healthMedicinePolitical sciencePopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Research capacity strengthening is essential for economically disadvantaged regions to overcome local health challenges, such as adolescent fertility.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.015
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.032
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Incentives · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.985
Threshold uncertainty score0.081

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0150.032
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0060.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.215
GPT teacher head0.506
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
DomainIncentives
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Global HealthSame topicGlobal Maternal and Child HealthFrench-language works237,207