MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2915052206 · doi:10.1161/str.50.suppl_1.wp372

Abstract WP372: International Comparison of Patient Characteristics and Quality of Care for Ischemic Stroke

2019· article· en· W2915052206 on OpenAlexaff
Runqi Wangqin, Daniel T. Laskowitz, Yongjun Wang, Zixiao Li, Yilong Wang, Liping Liu, Li Liang, Roland Matsouaka, Jeffrey L. Saver, Gregg C. Fonarow, Deepak L. Bhatt, Eric E. Smith, Lee H. Schwamm, Janet Prvu Bettger, Adrian F. Hernandez, Eric D. Peterson, Ying Xian

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineStroke (engine)Atrial fibrillationDeep veinDysphagiaIschemic strokeRehabilitationInternal medicineEmergency medicineThrombosisPhysical therapySurgeryIschemia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background and Purpose: Adherence to evidence-based guidelines is an important indicator of hospital stroke care quality; yet, there is lack of assessment of patient characteristics and performance measures in acute ischemic stroke for most world regions. Methods: We analyzed data of 19,604 acute ischemic stroke patients in China National Stroke Registry and 194,876 patients in GWTG-Stroke registry in US between 2012 to 2013 and compare their baseline characteristics and hospital performance measures. Results: Compared with US, Chinese patients were younger and had lower prevalence of comorbidities except for history of stroke/TIA or smoking. NIHSS was similar (China vs. US: median 4 [IQR 2-7] vs. 4 [1-10]). Chinese patients were more likely to have delays from last-known-well to hospital arrival (median 1,318 minutes [330-3,209] vs. 644 [142-2,055]), less likely to receive thrombolytic therapy (2.5% vs. 8.1%), and were more likely to experience treatment delays (door-to-needle time 95 minutes [72-112] vs. 62 [49-85]). Adherence to early and discharge antithrombotics, smoking cessation counseling, and dysphagia screening were relatively high (e.g.>80%) in both countries. However, large gaps existed in administration of intravenous thrombolytics within 3 hours (18.3% vs. 83.6%), door-to-needle time ≤60 minutes (14.6% vs. 48.0%), deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis (65.0% vs. 97.8%), anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation (21.0% vs. 94.4%), lipid treatment for low-density lipoprotein > 100 mg/dL (66.3% vs. 95.8%), and rehabilitation assessment (58.8% vs. 97.4%). Door-to-CT ≤25 minutes was relatively low in both countries (26.4% vs. 27.9%). Conclusions: We found significant differences in clinical characteristics and gaps in adherence for certain performance measures between China and US. Additional efforts are needed for continued improvements in acute stroke care and secondary prevention in both nations, especially China.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Evaluation · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.995
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.006
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designObservational
DomainEvaluation
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStroke→Same topicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management→French-language works237,207→