MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2915059822 · doi:10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjy222.559

P435 Rapidity of symptomatic and inflammatory biomarker improvements following upadacitinib induction treatment: data from the U-ACHIEVE study

2019· article· en· W2915059822 on OpenAlexaff
Geert D’Haens, Edward V. Loftus, Peter Higgins, Julián Panés, Remo Panaccione, Wen Zhou, Fabio Cataldi, B Huang, Wenhui Xie, Séverine Vermeire

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Crohn s and Colitis · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineGastroenterologyPlaceboBiomarkerC-reactive proteinCalprotectinUlcerative colitisInflammatory bowel diseaseInflammationPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Upadacitinib (UPA), an oral, selective Janus Kinase 1 inhibitor, demonstrated improved efficacy compared with placebo (PBO) in a Phase 2b induction study in patients with moderately-to-severely active ulcerative colitis (UC).1 This analysis assessed the time to onset of symptomatic improvement, clinical response, and improvement in biomarkers during the induction phase of U-ACHIEVE. Adult patients with moderately to severely active UC were randomised to double-blind therapy with extended-release UPA 7.5, 15, 30, 45 mg once daily (QD) or PBO for 8 weeks. Data from patient daily diary (as observed) on Mayo stool frequency subscore (SFS, 0–3) and rectal bleeding subscore (RBS, 0–3), as well as bowel urgency (BU, Y/N) and abdominal pain (AP, 0–3) were examined daily in the first 15 days of therapy. The proportion of patients with clinical response per partial Mayo score (decrease from baseline [BL] in Partial Mayo score ≥ 2 points and ≥ 30%, PLUS a decrease in RBS ≥ 1 or an absolute RBS ≤ 1), and the change from BL in high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and faecal calprotectin (FC) were evaluated at Week 2. Comparisons between each UPA dose with PBO for proportions was assessed by Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel tests and mean change from BL by analysis of covariance with treatment and randomisation factors as covariate. A total of 250 patients were randomised. The mean SFS was 2.7 and RBS was 1.7 at BL. Trends of higher proportion of patients achieving symptom improvement in SFS and RBS were observed in the UPA 45 mg group than PBO as early as Day 4 (figure) and reached statistical significance (p < 0.05) by Day 8 in SFS, RBS, BU, and AP (Table 1). Figure. Proportion of patients with (A) any decrease from baseline or maintaining 0 for patients with 0 at baseline for SFS and (B) any decrease from baseline or maintaining 0 for patients with 0 at baseline for RBS. Table 1. Proportion of patients with SFS =1, RBS = 0, AP =1, and no BU at Day 8. At Week 2, the proportion of patients with clinical response and the median change from BL in hs-CRP was statistically significantly greater in the UPA 15, 30, and 45 mg QD groups vs. the PBO group (Table 2). Table 2. Clinical and biomarker outcomes at Week 2. Early symptomatic improvement, as early as Day 4, was observed with UPA treatment in patients with active UC, concurrent with a rapid decrease in markers of inflammation. Reference 1. Sandborn WJ, Ghosh S, Pans J, et al. Efficacy and safety of upadacitinib as an induction therapy for patients with moderately-to-severely active ulcerative colitis: data from the phase 2b study U-ACHIEVE. In: United European Gastroenterology (UEG) Week, Presentation #OP195, 20–24 October 2018, Austria Center Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Crohn s and ColitisSame topicInflammatory Bowel DiseaseFrench-language works237,207