Synthesis and thermal stability of (Co,Ni)O solid solutions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract (Co,Ni)O solid solutions are considered as promising protective materials of O 2 ‐evolving anodes for Al production. In this context, two solid‐state synthesis methods, namely high‐energy ball milling (HEBM) and calcination, have been evaluated for the synthesis of (Co,Ni ) O solid solutions. In all cases, Co x Ni 1− x O solid solutions can be formed over the whole composition range. However, undesired WC contaminant is observed using the HEBM method due to the erosion of the milling tools. Their thermal stability in air has been analyzed by thermogravimetric analyzes (TGA) complemented by X‐ray diffraction (XRD) analyses. It is shown that Co x Ni 1− x O solid solutions are stable at 1000°C over the whole composition range whereas they are only stable for x ≤ 46 and x ≤ 22 at 800°C and 700°C, respectively. For higher Co contents, the formation of Co 3 O 4 is observed. This is a relevant information for their future use for Al production, which can be done at different temperatures (~700‐1000°C) depending of the electrolyte composition.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".