"Literary and Artistic Voices" in T.D. Regehr's Mennonites in Canada, 1939-1970: A Response, Two Observations, and Some Questions [Book Review]
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Response, Two Obseruations, d Some -stionsMavis Reimer, Tlze Depnr-tnzent ofEnglislz, Univei.sity of Wir?~zipegMy experience as a Mennonite student in secular postsecondary institutions was quite different from the experiences of the academics of the generation before me, to judge from T.D. Regehr's account in Menrzor~ites itz Cntzada, 1939-1970.1 graduated from the Steinbach High School in 1972, after the period of time with which Regehr's book is concerned, and entered the University of Winnipeg that fall.Al Reimer, Lloyd Siemens, Peter Pauls, and Kay Unruh were fill1 and respected members of tlie faculty of tlie English Department when I arrived in the early 1970s.The choices tliey liad made about their relationships to tlie Mennonite comnlunity and any accomniodations tliey liad made to attain tlie ranks of the professoriate of a sec~tlar institution were invisible to me.It seemed quite natural and ~lnexceptional at the time that I should be taught English literature by Mennonite professors.While my involvement during tlie 1980s with the Metzizot~ite Mirr.ot.gave me a broader sense of the sonietimes uneasy relationship of
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".