The Weighted Nearest Neighbor Estimate for Hammerstein System Identification
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper concerns the nonparametric identification problem for a class of nonlinear discrete-time dynamical systems that is characterized by its cascade structure. This is a Hammerstein system being a series connection of a nonlinear memoryless element followed by a linear dynamic system. The input-output training data generated from the system are dependent and they do not reveal the strong mixing property. The nonlinear part of the system is recovered with the weightedk-nearest neighbor regression estimate. The a priori information is nonparametric, both the nonlinear characteristic and the impulse response of the linear part are completely unknown and can be of any form. Local and global properties of the estimate are examined. Whatever the probability density of the input signal, the estimate converges at every continuity point of the characteristic as well as in the global sense. We derive the formulas for asymptotic bias and the variance and evaluate the corresponding rate of convergence. The convergence rate is independent of the shape of the input density and is proved to be optimal. These results allow us to find a set of optimal nonnegative weights that further improve the accuracy of our estimation algorithm. Our findings are supported by simulation experiments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".