Ecological and Socio-economic Sustainability of Ornamental Fish Business in Minapolitan Area of Blitar Regency, East Java, Indonesia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Minapolitan is a concept of sustainable development policy based on the fisheries area. Blitar Regency as a center of fish ornamental fish cultivation and the Minapolitan area since 2011. During the implementation process as well as the policy output stage, an evaluation is needed to determine the sustainability status of the Minapolitan area development policy from the ecological and socio-economic dimensions; and what the most sensitive attribute play a role in the multidimensional sustainability using Multi-Dimensional Scaling Method. The main finding that the ornamental fish business in Blitar Regency is sustainable category. The most sensitive attribute contributes to the multidimensional sustainability is fisheries resource fertility, rainfall, fish cultivation benefits, water quality, and environmental knowledge. The strategy to keep the sustainability status, for example maintaining water quality as well as implementing Good Aquaculture Practices (GAP) to keep fisheries resource fertility, diligently moving a certain size ornamental fish to the aquarium to avoid the unstable rainfall, creating consumer satisfaction and improving environmental knowledge.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".