MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Review of Extravagant Projects by Santiago Calatrava

2019· article· en· W2915349923 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Bartosz Mazur

Bibliographic record

VenueIOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Engineering and Vibration Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArchitectureAdmirationBridge (graph theory)EngineeringArt historyChoseVisual artsHumanitiesLibrary scienceHistoryArtLawPolitical scienceComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The topic of the article is a review of the most interesting and extravagant projects of Santiago Calatrava from the moment of his architectural beginning in civil engineering to the present. I focused on structures that caused the greatest wave of admiration and at the same time criticism of this known in the world architect. I chose objects, e.g.: buildings, structures, bridges and footbridges. I described the most important information, e.g. : construction time, construction costs, functionality, architectural style, technology and curiosities. The idea for the paper arose from my trip to the United States of America, where I had the opportunity to see one of the most interesting buildings - The World Trade Center Transportation Hub in New York. In addition, Santiago Calatrava's projects I discussed during lesson that in my university. The first part of the paper describes the author, his education, fascination with architecture, ideas for work and the future. In addition, I have included trivia related to childhood and adulthood of the architect. I described Calatrava's approach to projects and the entire implementation process from concept to finished construction. The following parts describe specific projects that I chose for analysis, these are: Stadelhofen railway station in Zurich, Bac de Roda bridge in Barcelona, Puente del Alamillo Expo 92 in Seville, Atrium of Brookfield Place in Toronto, Gare de Lyon Saint Exupéry railway station in Lyon, Gare do Oriente in Lisbon, Milwaukee Art Museum in Milwaukee, Auditorio de Tenerife in the Canary Islands, Science Museum in Valencia, Museum of Tomorrow in Rio de Janeiro, The World Trade Center Transportation Hub in New York. In the article, I've also placed interesting pictures that perfectly illustrate the architectural style, the scale of the building, and assess whether the object fits into the surroundings. In summary, I checked all the information and expressed my opinion on Calatrava's projects, its approach to architecture and described future plans for new buildings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.007
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIOP Conference Series Materials Science and EngineeringSame topicStructural Engineering and Vibration AnalysisFrench-language works237,207