2010 European guideline for the management of chancroid
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Chancroid is a sexually transmitted infection (STI) caused by the small Gram-negative bacterium Haemophilus ducreyi. Recommendations for the diagnosis and management of chancroid has been given by a number of different institutions, including Centers for Dis-eases Control and Prevention1, British Association for Sexual Health and HIV2, and Pub-lic Health Agency of Canada3. In contrast to genital herpes the number of cases of chancroid is overall decreasing, and the eradication of chancroid is considered a feasible objective4. However, chancroid is still a cause of genital ulcers in resource poor countries, especially in South East Asia and Africa (e.g. Botswana5), where outbreaks have been occurring among sex workers in the cities, including capitals such as Nairobi6. Europeans may contract the disease while stay-ing in these areas. As a number of persons travel from high-risk areas to work in the sex industry in Europe, the possibility of contracting chancroid in European countries should be considered. Us-ing an improved culture medium, Hafaz et al.7 found a higher number of chancroid cases than expected in Sheffield, and also demonstrated that many of the patients had concur-
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.016 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".