MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2915594431 · doi:10.1016/j.jms.2016.06.007

The 2015 edition of the GEISA spectroscopic database

2016· article· en· W2915594431 on OpenAlexafffund
N. Jacquinet-Husson, R. Armante, N. A. Scott, A. Chédin, L. Crépeau, C. Boutammine, Anis Bouhdaoui, Cyril Crévoisier, Virginie Capelle, Cathy Boonne, Nathalie Poulet‐Crovisier, A. Barbe, D. Chris Benner, Vincent Boudon, Linda R. Brown, J. Buldyreva, A. Campargue, L. H. Coudert, V. Malathy Devi, Michael J. Down, Brian J. Drouin, A. Fayt, Christa Fittschen, J.‐M. Flaud, Robert R. Gamache, Jeremy J. Harrison, C. Hill, Øivind Hodnebrog, Shui-Ming Hu, D. Jacquemart, A. Jolly, Elena Jiménez, N.N. Lavrentieva, A.-W. Liu, Lorenzo Lodi, O.M. Lyulin, S. T. Massie, С.Н. Михайленко, H. S. P. Müller, O. V. Naumenko, A.V. Nikitin, Claus J. Nielsen, J. Orphal, V. I. Perevalov, A. Perrin, E. R. Polovtseva, Adriana Predoi−Cross, M. Rotger, Albert A. Ruth, Shanshan Yu, Keeyoon Sung, S.A. Tashkun, Jonathan Tennyson, Vladimir G. Tyuterev, J. Vander Auwera, Б А Воронин, A. Makie

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Molecular Spectroscopy · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSpectroscopy and Laser Applications
Canadian institutionsLethbridge College
FundersDivision of Administrative ServicesNational Science Foundation of Sri LankaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaDivision of Mathematical SciencesEuropean CommissionEuropean Organization for the Exploitation of Meteorological SatellitesCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueJet Propulsion LaboratoryCentre National d’Etudes SpatialesUniversity College CorkFreie Universität BerlinFonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRSRussian Foundation for Basic ResearchUniversité Catholique de LouvainAgence Nationale de la RechercheSight Research UKCalifornia Institute of TechnologyUCL Engineering, University College LondonScience Foundation IrelandNational Science FoundationUniversity of LethbridgeCitrus Research BoardNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationNatural Environment Research CouncilVision of Children FoundationNational Center for Atmospheric Research
KeywordsDatabaseComputer scienceLibrary scienceMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.093
Threshold uncertainty score0.313

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0130.016
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0930.137

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations396
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Molecular SpectroscopySame topicSpectroscopy and Laser ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207