MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2915632944 · doi:10.1097/dcr.0000000000001352

The Impact of Muscle and Adipose Tissue on Long-term Survival in Patients With Stage I to III Colorectal Cancer

2019· article· en· W2915632944 on OpenAlexaff
Jessica Hopkins, Rebecca Reif, David L. Bigam, Vickie E. Baracos, Dean T. Eurich, Michael B. Sawyer

Bibliographic record

VenueDiseases of the Colon & Rectum · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNutrition and Health in Aging
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSarcopeniaColorectal cancerInternal medicineProportional hazards modelCancerRetrospective cohort studyBody mass indexMultivariate analysisAdipose tissuePopulationSurvival analysisStage (stratigraphy)Oncology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Computed tomography-derived body composition parameters are emerging prognostic factors in colorectal cancer. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the roles of sarcopenia, myosteatosis, and obesity as independent and overlapping parameters in stage I to III colorectal cancer. DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study from a prospectively collected database. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were performed to assess the associations between body composition parameters and survival. SETTINGS: All patients were seen in a tertiary care cancer center. PATIENTS: Adult patients with stage I to III colorectal cancer, undergoing curative resection from 2007 to 2009, were included. INTERVENTION: Computed tomography-derived quantification of skeletal muscle and adipose tissues was used to determine population-specific cutoffs for sarcopenia, myosteatosis, and total adiposity. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome measures were overall, recurrence-free, and cancer-specific survival. RESULTS: In the 968 patients included, there were a total of 254 disease recurrences and 350 deaths. Body mass index and CT-derived measures of adiposity did not result in worse survival outcomes. Sarcopenia was independently predictive of worse overall (HR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.16-1.84), recurrence-free (HR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.00-1.75), and cancer-specific survival (HR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.09-1.94) in a multivariate model. Myosteatosis was also independently predictive of overall survival (HR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.19-1.97). In a model considering joint effects of sarcopenia and myosteatosis, the presence of both predicted the worst overall (HR, 2.23; 95% CI, 1.62-3.06), recurrence-free (HR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.06-2.21), and cancer-specific survival (HR, 2.40; 95% CI, 1.69-3.42) in a multivariate model. LIMITATIONS: The limitations of this study are inherent in retrospective observational studies. CONCLUSIONS: Sarcopenia and myosteatosis are independent predictors of worse survival in stage I to III colorectal cancer, and their joint effect is highly predictive of reduced overall, recurrence-free, and cancer-specific survival. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A923.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.180

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations144
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiseases of the Colon & RectumSame topicNutrition and Health in AgingFrench-language works237,207