Bibliographic record
Abstract
The notes we have from Bernard Lonergan on the website www.bemardlonergan.comfor his 1947-48 course on grace at the Jesuit Seminary in Toronto (now Regis College) are in two sets.They appear at 16000DTL040 and 16200DTL040.Translations by Michael Shields, with extensive editorial work by H. Daniel Monsour, are also available on the website, at 16000DTE040 and 16200DTE040.It is difficult, and in fact probably impossible without further external guidance, to put the two sets of notes in order and to relate them to each other.Fortunately, that guidance is available in the form of notes taken by Frederick Crowe and William Stewart, who were Jesuit students in the course.Their notes, preserved by Crowe, give a very clear indication regarding the order of the course.They enable us to reconstruct the course, something that would not be possible even in piecemeal fashion if we were working only from the archival data.The course is important in Lonergan' s development.It represents in several respects an intermediate position between his 1946 systematic treatise "De ente supematurali" 1 and his contributions to a course on grace in 1951-52, again at the Jesuit Seminary. 2In the latter contribution he introduced material that would come to be known as his "four-point hypothesis"
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.023 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".