Bibliographic record
Abstract
During the 1870s, Dostoevsky was involved in two major journalistic ventures. In late 1872, he became editor of Prince Vladimir Meshchersky's conservative weekly, Grazhdanin ( The Citizen ). From January 1, 1873, to April 22, 1874, he edited sixty-five issues and wrote two regular columns called “Diary of a Writer” and “Foreign Affairs.” Two years later he founded his own monthly periodical, also called Dnevnik pisatelya ( Diary of a Writer ). This monojournal, for which he served as publisher, editor, and sole contributor, ran for twenty-two issues from 1876 to 1877, was resurrected for a single issue in 1880, and came out once again the month before his death in 1881. Because it engaged with the burning issues of the day and expressed patriotic zeal as the Russo-Turkish war began in 1877, it attracted large numbers of subscribers. Moreover, because The Citizen and Diary of a Writer served as creative laboratories within which Dostoevsky formulated his varied literary responses to the challenges of modernization, both journals provide unique insights into the social, ideological, and aesthetic preoccupations that shaped the novels of his last decade. After returning from Siberian exile in 1859, Dostoevsky founded and edited the journals Vremya ( Time , 1861–3) and Epokha ( Epoch , 1864–5) together with his brother Mikhail. Although he did not edit a journal between 1865 and 1873, Dostoevsky wrote novels to be published serially in thick journals*. Like his fellow heavyweight novelists, Dostoevsky was normally granted a generous amount of space (serialized installments could range in length from thirty pages to one or two hundred) and most of his novels up to The Brothers Karamazov (1879–80) were serialized within the twelve annual issues of the host journal. When Dostoevsky returned to editorial duties in 1873, the journalistic scene had changed dramatically. The intelligentsia 's* optimism in the early 1860s about the Great Reforms, which included the emancipation of the serfs (1861), the judicial reform (1864), the introduction of local self-government or zemstvo * (1864), and a relaxation of censorship regulations (1865), had given way to bitter disillusionment which was reflected on the pages of journals and newspapers on both left and right. Discontent with the impact of the Great Reforms was evident at all levels of society, and in 1871, sparked by the ten-year anniversary of the emancipation, the Russian press, benefiting from the relaxation of censorship, reflected this discontent.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".