MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2915854359 · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139236867.035

Dostoevsky's journalism in the 1870s

2015· book-chapter· en· W2915854359 on OpenAlexaff
Kate Holland

Bibliographic record

VenueCambridge University Press eBooks · 2015
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation, Literature, Philosophy Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIdeologyModernization theoryJournalismTurkishHistoryMedia studiesLiteratureArt historyPolitical scienceClassicsArtSociologyLawPoliticsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During the 1870s, Dostoevsky was involved in two major journalistic ventures. In late 1872, he became editor of Prince Vladimir Meshchersky's conservative weekly, Grazhdanin (The Citizen). From January 1, 1873, to April 22, 1874, he edited sixty-five issues and wrote two regular columns called “Diary of a Writer” and “Foreign Affairs.” Two years later he founded his own monthly periodical, also called Dnevnik pisatelya (Diary of a Writer). This monojournal, for which he served as publisher, editor, and sole contributor, ran for twenty-two issues from 1876 to 1877, was resurrected for a single issue in 1880, and came out once again the month before his death in 1881. Because it engaged with the burning issues of the day and expressed patriotic zeal as the Russo-Turkish war began in 1877, it attracted large numbers of subscribers. Moreover, because The Citizen and Diary of a Writer served as creative laboratories within which Dostoevsky formulated his varied literary responses to the challenges of modernization, both journals provide unique insights into the social, ideological, and aesthetic preoccupations that shaped the novels of his last decade.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.864
Threshold uncertainty score0.974

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.100
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCambridge University Press eBooksSame topicEducation, Literature, Philosophy ResearchFrench-language works237,207