Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this article, I trace how urban revitalization is tied to a rearticulation of social citizenship in Canada. Whilehousing policy was framed as a priority under the welfare state, there is a distinct transition whereby concernsabout public housing were displaced from federal and provincial agendas. Through reform, the state shiftedresponsibility for elements of social policy that were previously characterized as a national priority to localgovernments or the private sector, laying a foundation for neoliberal urban revitalization of public housing. Iexplore the relationality between the welfare state and neoliberal governance and the subsequent rearticulationof social citizenship in a postindustrial economic context. By providing an overview of key shifts in social/publichousing policy in Canada, with particular focus on Toronto, Ontario, I argue that housing policy and the urbanrevitalization of public housing are tools for a neoliberal rearticulation of social citizenship in Canada. Résumé Dans cet article, j’analyse les liens entre la revitalisation urbaine et la réarticulation de la citoyenneté sociale auCanada. Bien que les politiques de logement aient été présentées comme une priorité de l’État providence, ily a eu une transition distincte menant au retrait du logement social de la liste de priorités des gouvernementsfédéral et provinciaux. Par ses réformes, l’État a déplacé la responsabilité de certains éléments de politiques socialesautrefois considérés comme étant de priorité nationale vers les gouvernements locaux et le secteur privé,jetant ainsi les bases d’une revitalisation urbaine néolibérale du logement social. J’analyse la corrélation entrel’État providence et la gouvernance néolibérale, et la réarticulation subséquente de la citoyenneté sociale dansun contexte économique postindustriel. En présentant un aperçu général des changements majeurs dans lespolitiques de logement social, en particulier à Toronto, en Ontario, je soutiens que les politiques de logementet la revitalisation urbaine du logement social sont des outils permettant une réarticulation néolibérale de lacitoyenneté sociale au Canada.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".