MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2916077285 · doi:10.1111/1471-0528.15661

Impact of maternal body mass index and gestational weight gain on pregnancy complications: an individual participant data meta‐analysis of European, North American and Australian cohorts

2019· review· en· W2916077285 on OpenAlexaff
Susana Santos, Ellis Voerman, Pilar Amiano, Henrique Barros, Lawrence J. Beilin, Anna Bergström, Marie‐Aline Charles, L. Chatzi, Cécile Chevrier, GP Chrousos, Eva Corpeleijn, O. A. Dalla Costa, Nathalie Costet, Sarah Crozier, Graham Devereux, Myriam Doyon, Merete Eggesbø, MP Fantini, Sara Farchi, Francesco Forastiere, Vagelis Georgiu, Keith M. Godfrey, Davide Gori, Veit Grote, Wojciech Hanke, Irva Hertz‐Picciotto, Barbara Heude, Daniel Hryhorczuk, R‐C Huang, Hazel Inskip, AM Karvonen, Louise C. Kenny, Berthold Koletzko, Leanne K. Küpers, Hanna Lagström, Irina Lehmann, Per Magnus, Renata Majewska, Johanna Mäkelä, Yannis Μanios, Fionnuala M. McAuliffe, S W McDonald, John Mehegan, E. Melén, Monique Mommers, CS Morgen, George Moschonis, David M. Murray, Carol Ní Chaoimh, Ellen A. Nøhr, Emily Oken, AJJM Oostvogels, Agnieszka Pac, Eleni Papadopoulou, Juha Pekkanen, Costanza Pizzi, Kinga Polańska, Daniela Porta, Lorenzo Richiardi, SL Rifas‐Shiman, Nel Roeleveld, Luca Ronfani, Ana Cristina Santos, Marie Standl, Hein Stigum, Camilla Stoltenberg, Elisabeth Thiering, Carel Thijs, Maties Torrent, Suzanne Tough, T Trnovec, Steve Turner, Lenie van Rossem, Andrea von Berg, Martine Vrijheid, Jane West, A. H. Wijga, John Wright, Олександр Звінчук, TIA Sørensen, Debbie A. Lawlor, Romy Gaillard, VWV Jaddoe

Bibliographic record

VenueBJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · 2019
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGestational Diabetes Research and Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de SherbrookeUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentNational Institutes of HealthBritish Heart FoundationNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney DiseasesMedical Research CouncilNational Institute for Health and Care Research
KeywordsBody mass indexPregnancyMeta-analysisIndex (typography)ObstetricsMedicineWeight gainGestationDemographyBody weightInternal medicineSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To assess the separate and combined associations of maternal pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) and gestational weight gain with the risks of pregnancy complications and their population impact. DESIGN: Individual participant data meta-analysis of 39 cohorts. SETTING: Europe, North America, and Oceania. POPULATION: 265 270 births. METHODS: Information on maternal pre-pregnancy BMI, gestational weight gain, and pregnancy complications was obtained. Multilevel binary logistic regression models were used. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Gestational hypertension, pre-eclampsia, gestational diabetes, preterm birth, small and large for gestational age at birth. RESULTS: Higher maternal pre-pregnancy BMI and gestational weight gain were, across their full ranges, associated with higher risks of gestational hypertensive disorders, gestational diabetes, and large for gestational age at birth. Preterm birth risk was higher at lower and higher BMI and weight gain. Compared with normal weight mothers with medium gestational weight gain, obese mothers with high gestational weight gain had the highest risk of any pregnancy complication (odds ratio 2.51, 95% CI 2.31- 2.74). We estimated that 23.9% of any pregnancy complication was attributable to maternal overweight/obesity and 31.6% of large for gestational age infants was attributable to excessive gestational weight gain. CONCLUSIONS: Maternal pre-pregnancy BMI and gestational weight gain are, across their full ranges, associated with risks of pregnancy complications. Obese mothers with high gestational weight gain are at the highest risk of pregnancy complications. Promoting a healthy pre-pregnancy BMI and gestational weight gain may reduce the burden of pregnancy complications and ultimately the risk of maternal and neonatal morbidity. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Promoting a healthy body mass index and gestational weight gain might reduce the population burden of pregnancy complications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.021
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.037
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.113

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0210.037
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0090.043
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.235
GPT teacher head0.448
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations593
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & GynaecologySame topicGestational Diabetes Research and ManagementFrench-language works237,207