MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2916173364 · doi:10.2118/0408-0054-jpt

Technology Focus: Offshore Drilling and Completion (April 2008)

2008· article· en· W2916173364 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jean-Louis Jousseaume

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Petroleum Technology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDrilling and Well Engineering
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDrillingCompletion (oil and gas wells)WorkoverPetroleum engineeringUnderbalanced drillingOffshore drillingDrilling fluidHigh pressureGeologyEngineeringMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Technology Focus I do not yet consider myself an old-timer. However, I remember when I started studying petroleum engineering; our teacher was telling us that drilling was a technology that had not progressed in years, not since its last revolution—the introduction of rotary drilling. The word "revolution" here definitely seems the right one. Since those days, we have seen the introduction of new technologies, such as measurement while drilling, steerable systems, top drives, more-reliable dynamic-positioning systems, dual handling, smart completions, new equipment, new chemicals, new metallurgy, and an exhaustive list of others. These advances enabled success of wells that were increasingly difficult, and we now are drilling horizontally (again, I remember: "It is impossible to drill horizontally, because it is impossible to transmit weight on bit horizontally") and underbalanced, we are drilling high-pressure/high-temperature (and soon very-high-pressure/very-high-temperature) reservoirs and in deep and ultradeep waters, and we are drilling slim or ultraslim wellbores, multilateral and extended-reach wellbores, and combinations of these. Future wellbores will be even more exotic. We complete wells with smart technology or sophisticated multilateral connections, produce gas from tight or ultratight sands, and heat silts in-situ to produce heavy bitumen. Simultaneously, we are making tremendous progress to protect people from incidents and diseases and our environment from unbearable or irreversible damages, especially when using nonaqueous-based mud. Again, this list of recent advances is not complete, but it gives the strong feeling that all of us are engineers dealing with a moving and expanding technology. Actually, it gives me the strong belief that we will overcome new challenges and that, peak oil or not (whenever it may happen), there still is a lot to engineer, a lot to invent, and a lot to progress to move the limits of feasibility in drilling and well engineering further and further. Offshore Drilling and Completion additional reading available at the SPE eLibrary: www.spe.org SPE 105212 • "Deployment of a Riserless Mud-Recovery System Offshore Sakhalin Island" by J.D. Brown, CJSC Elvary Neftegaz, et al. SPE 110359 • "Subsea Slimhole Completions in Deepwater Gulf of Mexico: Case Histories" by J.R. Sanford, Eni Petroleum, et al. Additional reading available at the OTC Library: www.otcnet.org OTC 19077 • "First Jackup Drilling Operation on Grand Banks of Newfoundland—Lessons Learned" by G.C. Bagnell, Rowan Companies OTC 18496 • "2-Million-lbm Slip-Based Landing-String System Pushes the Limit of Deepwater Casing Running" by James N. Brock, Grant Prideco, et al.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.275
Threshold uncertainty score0.770

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Petroleum TechnologySame topicDrilling and Well EngineeringFrench-language works237,207