OBSERVATIONS SUR LA CONCEPTION JUDICIAIRE DU ROLE DE LA JUSTICE CONTRACTUELLE EN MATIERE D’HYPOTHEQUE CONVENTIONNELLE
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Inspired by a concept of contractual justice, the spirit behind the reform of the Civil Code of Quebec was expressed in a set of provisions designed to protect vulnerable contracting parties. Accordingly, some provisions of the specific legal regime governing conventional hypothecs, such as Articles 2668, 2683, 2684, 2758, 2761, 2778 and 2779 C.C.Q., are based on a certain concept of contractual justice that plays a role both when the contract is formed and when it is executed further to a default by the debtor. Indeed, by restricting access to certain forms of hypothec by natural persons, the legislator wanted to shield them from the seizure of certain types of property and, indirectly, from going too far into debt. By ensuring that the debtor has an opportunity to cure his default and by giving him tools when he is faced with a creditor who wants to take hypothecated property in payment, the legislator sought to protect the debtor from impoverishment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.030 | 0.031 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.073 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.008 | 0.019 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".