MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2916303761 · doi:10.2118/0917-0024-jpt

E&P Notes (September 2017)

2017· article· en· W2916303761 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Joel Parshall, Stephen Rassenfoss, Trent Jacobs

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Petroleum Technology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicBorder Security and International Relations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDrillingBoomProductivityOil shaleQuarter (Canadian coin)WellheadPetroleum industryDirectional drillingCompletion (oil and gas wells)EngineeringOperating expenseEconomicsAgricultural economicsPetroleum engineeringMechanical engineeringHistoryFinanceArchaeologyEconomic growth

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

E&P Notes Researchers: Models Overstate Technology Impact, Understate Location Impact for Unconventional Wells Joel Parshall, JPT Features Editor The role of new technological improvements in the increasing productivity of tight oil and shale gas wells is likely being overestimated because of models that inadequately consider the influence of drilling in reservoir core areas, a pair of researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Energy Initiative (MITEI) have said in a new paper. With the steep fall in oil prices since late 2014, field operators are drilling fewer wells and have shifted their targets to only the most prospective acreage. The oil industry’s often well-publicized gains in well productivity significantly reflect the impact of drilling and hydraulic fracturing operations focused on reservoir “sweet spots,” MITEI’s Justin Montgomery and Francis O’Sullivan write in a paper in Applied Energy. Drilling Boom Goes Flat Stephen Rassenfoss, JPT Emerging Technology Senior Editor Growth in the US rig count stalled in mid-July, in what could be a sign of things to come. After doubling over the previous 12 months, the rig count remained flat, slipping to 949 as of 11 August, according to the Baker Hughes Rig Count. But surveys of industry insiders by the Federal Reserve banks of Dallas and Kansas City see that rally running out, with shrinking spending on capital expenditures (Capex) and drilling. “We see the expected Capex and expected drilling number are still positive. It is a lot less positive than in the first quarter and certainly in the fourth quarter of last year,” said Chad Wilkerson, the branch executive and economist at the Kansas City Fed’s Oklahoma City branch, adding, “Leveling seems to be the story.” US Daily Oil Production To Break Record in 2018 Joel Parshall, JPT Features Editor Average total crude oil production in the United States is expected to reach a record level of 9.9 million B/D in 2018, the US Energy Information Administration (EIA) said in its latest forecast. The projected output would surpass the 9.6 million B/D that the US produced in 1970. The forecast said that total US crude oil production will average 9.3 million B/D this year, an increase of 500,000 B/D from 2016. Most of the production growth from June through the end of next year is expected to come from tight rock formations in the Permian region of Texas and from the Federal Offshore Gulf of Mexico (GOM). IEA: US May Be Top LNG Exporter by 2022 Trent Jacobs, JPT Digital Editor The US may become the global leader in liquefied natural gas (LNG) exports, according to a new report by the International Energy Agency (IEA). To ascend to the top spot, US LNG shipments must surpass today’s leading exporters, Australia and Qatar. The IEA called US LNG a “catalyst for change” and highlighted how production from tight shale gas fields is transforming the world’s natural gas marketplace. The Paris-based organization also said the country’s exports will help fuel economic growth in developing countries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.020
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.697
Threshold uncertainty score0.432

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.020
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0130.005
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0050.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.6970.635

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.388
Teacher spread0.338 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Petroleum TechnologySame topicBorder Security and International RelationsFrench-language works237,207