MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2916312287 · doi:10.1017/jfm.2019.54

Drag reduction and instabilities of flows in longitudinally grooved annuli

2019· article· en· W2916312287 on OpenAlexaff
H. V. Moradi, J. M. Floryan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Fluid Mechanics · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsMechanicsLaminar flowReynolds numberDragAnnulus (botany)Rotational symmetryClassical mechanicsPressure gradientInstabilityInertial waveSecondary flowGeometryLongitudinal waveWave propagationMechanical waveTurbulenceOpticsMaterials scienceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The primary and secondary laminar flows in annuli with longitudinal grooves and driven by pressure gradients have been analysed. There exist geometric configurations reducing pressure losses in primary flows in spite of an increase of the wall wetted area. The parameter ranges when such flows exist have been determined using linear stability theory. Two types of secondary flows have been identified. The first type has the form of the classical travelling waves driven by shear and modified by the grooves. The axisymmetric waves dominate for sufficiently large radii of the annuli while different spiral waves dominate for small radii. The secondary flow topology is unique in the former case and has the form of axisymmetric rings propagating in the axial direction. Topologies in the latter case are not unique, as spiral waves with left and right twists can emerge under the same conditions, resulting in flow structures varying from spatial rings to rhombic forms. The most intense motion of this type occurs near the walls. The second type of secondary flow has the form of travelling waves driven by inertial effects with characteristics very distinct from the shear waves. Its critical Reynolds number increases proportionally to $S^{-2}$ , where $S$ denotes the groove amplitude, while the amplification rates increase proportionally to $S^{2}$ . These waves exist only if $S$ is above a well-defined minimum and their axisymmetric forms dominate, with the most intense motion occurring near the annulus mid-section. Geometries that give preference to the latter waves have been identified. It is shown that the drag-reducing topographies stabilize the classical travelling waves; these waves are driven by viscous shear, so reduction of this shear decreases their amplification. The same topographies destabilize the new waves; these waves are driven by an inviscid mechanism associated with the formation of circumferential inflection points, and an increase of the groove amplitude increases their amplification. The flow conditions when the presence of grooves can be ignored, i.e. the annuli can be treated as being hydraulically smooth, have been determined.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.588
Threshold uncertainty score0.421

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Fluid MechanicsSame topicFluid Dynamics and Turbulent FlowsFrench-language works237,207