Modeling Multiphase Effects in CO2 Compressors at Subcritical Inlet Conditions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An advanced numerical framework to model CO2 compressors over a wide range of subcritical conditions is presented in this paper. Thermodynamic and transport properties are obtained through a table look-up procedure with specialized features for subcritical conditions. Phase change is triggered by the difference between the local values of pressure and saturation pressure, and both vaporization and condensation can be modeled. Rigorous validation of the framework is presented for condensation in high pressure CO2 using test data in a De Laval nozzle. The comparisons between computations and test data include: condensation onset locations, Wilson line, and nozzle pressure profiles as a function of inlet pressures. The framework is applied to the Sandia compressor that has been modeled over broad range of conditions spanning the saturation dome including: near critical inlet conditions (305.4 K, and 7.843 MPa), pure liquid inlet conditions (at 295 K), pure vapor inlet conditions (at 302 K), and two-phase inlet conditions (at 290 K). Multiphase effects ranging from cavitation at the liquid line to condensation at the vapor line have been simulated. The role of real fluid effects in enhancing multiphase effects at elevated temperatures closer to the critical point has been identified. The performance of the compressor has been compared with test data; the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) results also show that the head-flow coefficient curve collapses with relatively minor scatter, similar to the test data, when the flow coefficient is defined on the impeller exit meridional velocity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".