MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2916456712 · doi:10.19184/bisma.v11i3.6471

PENGARUH KUALITAS PRODUK DAN KUALITAS LAYANAN TERHADAP KEPUASAN DAN LOYALITAS PENGGUNA KASMDI KBS

2018· article· en· W2916456712 on OpenAlexaff
Galih Arief Prakosa, Udisubakti Ciptomulyono, Fuad Achmadi

Bibliographic record

VenueBISMA Jurnal Bisnis dan Manajemen · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicConsumer Behavior and Marketing Influence
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLoyaltyProduct (mathematics)BusinessService qualityQuality (philosophy)Loyalty business modelPath analysis (statistics)User satisfactionService (business)Customer satisfactionMarketingComputer scienceMathematicsHuman–computer interaction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract: The availability of consumable water is a basic human right. The State Water Supply Company (PDAM) Surya Sembada is the only government institution in charge in providing and managing drinking water facilities and infrastructure in Surabaya. PDAM Surya Sembada provides free fountain drinking (KASM) as their Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) program that located in various strategic public places in the city including in Surabaya Zoo (KBS). However, there has never been any analysis on the product and service quality of the KASM in KBS. Therefore, the objective of this study is to analyze the effect of product and service quality of the KASM in KBS on user satisfaction and loyalty using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) with Partial Least Square (PLS) analysis. Results of path coefficient analysis show that product quality affects user satisfaction, but it has no effect on user loyalty. Service quality affects user satisfaction and loyalty. User satisfaction affects user loyalty. It can be concluded that user satisfaction is affected by product and service quality, while user loyalty is affected by service quality and user satisfaction. Keywords: KASM, Product Quality, Service Quality, User Satisfaction, User Loyalty.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.121

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0360.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBISMA Jurnal Bisnis dan ManajemenSame topicConsumer Behavior and Marketing InfluenceFrench-language works237,207