Features of regeneration and growth of stem cuttings of decorative forms of the genus Juniperus L., promising for green construction in Belarus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Modern urbanization processes lead to the need to introduce new approaches to urban gardening in the practice of green building, which in turn requires the renewal and expansion of the range of ornamental plants that are used, characterized by their compactness and high resistance to environmental factors. An important role in this is given to plant introduction, designed at the first stage to assess the prospects of introductions and draw conclusions about the advisability of their further use in gardening. This article presents the results of primary introductory tests of 10 cultivars of 4 species of the genus Juniperus L., conducted in 2008–2018. It is established that the cultivars studied are characterized by a stable rhythm of shoot growth, which begins in late April and ends in the first half of September, which ensures the success of their wintering in the open ground. The evaluation of the regenerative capacity of stem cuttings made it possible to identify among the objects as hard-to-root forms (J. horizontalis ‘Emerald Spreader’ and ‘Monber’, J. sabina ‘Tam No Blight’ and J. chinensis ‘Gold Coast’) and medium- (J. horizontalis ‘Prince of Wales’, ‘Limeglow’ and ‘Glacier’, J. conferta ‘Shlager’) and easily rooted (J. horizontalis ‘Winter Blue’ and ‘Yukon Belle’). Satisfactory ability of stem cuttings to root formation allows to organize the production of planting material on the territory of the republic.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".