MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2916625407 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2015-3865

Abstract 3865: Thymocyte selection-associated HMG box protein (TOX) induces genomic instability in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia

2015· article· en· W2916625407 on OpenAlexaff
Riadh Lobbardi, Jordan Pinder, Barbara Martinez, Jessica S. Blackburn, Nouran S. Abdelfattah, Debra Toiber, Manon de Waard, Esha Jain, Ruslan I. Sadreyev, John M. Asara, Raúl Mostoslavsky, Graham Dellaire, David M. Langenau

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA modifications and cancer
Canadian institutionsBeatrice Hunter Cancer Research Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKu70ThymocyteGenome instabilityKu80BiologyZebrafishDNA repairT cellCancer researchT-cell receptorMolecular biologyCell biologyDNA damageGeneticsGeneDNADNA-binding proteinTranscription factor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract MYC and NOTCH are major oncogenic drivers in T-cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (T-ALL), yet additional collaborating genetic lesions likely collaborate to induce frank malignancy. To identify these factors, a large-scale transgenic screen was completed where 28 amplified and over-expressed genes found in human T-ALL were assessed for accelerating leukemia onset in a zebrafish transgenic model. From this analysis, Thymocyte selection-associated HMG protein (TOX) synergized with both MYC and NOTCH to induce T-ALL. TOX is dynamically regulated in T cell development with peak expression occurring when thymocytes are actively undergoing T cell receptor (TCR) recombination. Despite TOX being genomically amplified in a subset of human and mouse T-ALL and being overexpressed near all human T-ALL, a role for TOX in inducing T-ALL has not been reported. Characterization of zebrafish T-ALLs revealed that TOX expands the overall number of malignant T-ALL clones and promoted genomic instability as assessed by changes in DNA content and Whole Genome Sequencing. To identify TOX binding partners, TOX immunoprecipitation-Tandem Mass Spectrometry has been performed in human T-ALL cells. TOX was found to interact with KU70/KU80 but not other DNA repair enzymes, a result verified by co-immunoprecipitation studies. Given that TOX elevated genomic instability in the zebrafish model and bound specifically to KU70/KU80 - the initiating factors required for Non-Homologous End Joining (NHEJ) repair - we hypothesized that TOX is a negative regulator of double-strand break repair. Fluorescent repair assays were completed in 3T3 fibroblasts and confirmed that TOX inhibits NHEJ. Dynamic real-time imaging studies showed that TOX suppresses recruitment of fluorescent-tagged KU70 to DNA breaks. Importantly, TOX loss of function increased NHEJ in human T-ALL cells and reduced time to DNA repair as assessed by fluorescent Traffic Light Reporter assays and quantitative assessment of 53BP1 and γH2A.X foci resolution following irradiation. Given the prominent role TOX has in T cell development and its coordinated regulation during active TCRβ and TCRα rearrangement, it is likely that the normal function of TOX is to transiently suppress the NHEJ pathway during RAG-mediated recombination. Prolonging the time to DNA repair would likely facilitate long-range repair across VDJ segments. In the setting of T-ALL, TOX is aberrantly re-activated, thereby suppressing KU70/KU80 function to promote genomic instability and ultimately elevating rates at which acquired mutations and rearrangements are amassed in developing pre-malignant T cells. Citation Format: Riadh Lobbardi, Jordan Pinder, Barbara Martinez, Jessica Blackburn, Nouran Abdelfattah, Debra Toiber, Manon De Waard, Esha Jain, Ruslan Sadreyev, John Asara, Raul Mostoslavsky, Graham Dellaire, David M. Langenau. Thymocyte selection-associated HMG box protein (TOX) induces genomic instability in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr 3865. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-3865

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicRNA modifications and cancer→French-language works237,207→