Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ah! L’adolescence… Cette periode de transition si dense ou nos petits deviennent des grands et decident de s’affirmer : « Faire une activite en famille ou en groupe? Non merci! » A moins d’avoir sous la main un guide unique en son genre qui fourmille de bonnes idees d’activites stimulantes et de lieux hors du commun a decouvrir partout au Quebec. Vos ados en redemanderont! Parents, professeurs, animateurs et educateurs, vous trouverez dans ce guide inedit plus de 350 suggestions d’activites excitantes pour les 12-17 ans, regroupees par themes evocateurs : Aventures exaltantes! Les expeditions chargees d’adrenaline et les explorations inoubliables. Initiation aux sciences! Le domaine scientifique presente de facon instructive et ludique. Decouverte de la faune! Les meilleurs lieux d’observation des animaux. Aventures du passe! L’histoire abordee de maniere imaginative. Delices! Les restos ou casser la croute et les commerces gourmands. Hebergement inusite! Des lieux etonnants ou passer la nuit.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.015 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.102 | 0.011 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".