MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2916796522 · doi:10.1109/glocom.2018.8647489

Real-Time Intrusion Detection in Network Traffic Using Adaptive and Auto-Scaling Stream Processor

2018· article· en· W2916796522 on OpenAlexaff
G. V. Loganathan, Jagath Samarabandu, Xianbin Wang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Security and Intrusion Detection
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceStream processingIntrusion detection systemParticle swarm optimizationPortingReal-time computingFlexibility (engineering)Software deploymentDistributed computingData miningAlgorithmOperating systemSoftware

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Advanced intrusion detection systems are beginning to utilize the power and flexibility offered by Complex Event Processing (CEP) engines. Adapting to new attacks and optimizing CEP rules are two challenges in this domain. Optimizing CEP rules requires a complete framework which can be ported to stream processors because a CEP rule cannot run without a stream processor. External dependencies of stream processors make CEP rule a black box which is hard to optimize. In this paper, we present a novel adaptive and functionally autoscaling stream processor: “Wisdom” with a built-in hybrid optimizer developed using Particle Swarm Optimization, and Bisection algorithms to optimize CEP rule parameters. We show that an adaptive “Wisdom” rule tuned by the proposed optimization algorithm is able to detect selected attacks in CICIDS 2017 dataset with an average precision of 99.98% and an average recall of 93.42% while processing over 2.5 million events per second. The proposed distributed functionally autoscaling deployment mode consumes significantly fewer system resources than the monolithic deployment of CEP rules.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.975
Threshold uncertainty score0.566

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNetwork Security and Intrusion DetectionFrench-language works237,207