A condensed wheelchair skills training ‘bootcamp’ improves students’ self-efficacy for assessing, training, spotting, and documenting manual and power wheelchair skills
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objectives: To determine the influence of a bootcamp training approach on students’ self-efficacy for assessing, training, spotting, documenting, and performing manual and power wheelchair skills.Methods: In a pre-post design, students in their final year of an entry-to-practice master of occupational therapy program completed a two-day manual (6.5 h) and power (6.5 h) wheelchair skills bootcamp. Outcomes for self-efficacy (in assessing, training, spotting and documenting manual and power wheelchair skills; primary) and capacity (manual and power wheelchair skills; secondary) were collected at baseline and immediately after the bootcamp.Results: Participants (n = 44) were 27.3 ± 4.3 years of age (41 female). Most students (81.8%) reported little previous experience using manual and power wheelchairs at baseline. Students’ self-efficacy for assessing, training, spotting, and documenting manual and power wheelchair skills improved by between 28.4% and 35.3%, representing a change from ‘somewhat confident’ to ‘fairly confident’. Students’ manual and power wheelchair skills capacity increased by 47.2% and 37.1% respectively.Conclusions: Wheelchair skills training bootcamps may help prepare occupational therapy students to assess, train, spot, and document manual and power wheelchair skills of future clients, while improving students’ wheelchair skills capacity; thus may provide an option for integrating wheelchair skills training into the curriculum of time-intensive programs.Implications for rehabiliationA two-day condensed wheelchair skills training workshop improves occupational therapystudents’ self-efficacy for assessing, training, spotting and documenting power andmanual wheelchair skills.A two-day condensed wheelchair skills training workshop improves occupationaltherapy students’ power and manual wheelchair skills.Self-efficacy is an indicator of future behaviours. Therefore, improving students’ selfefficacyfor assessing training and documenting wheelchair skills may influence their future practice.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".