Faith, Hope & Love: Postscript on Interprofessional Processes for Innovating Generation / Foi, espoir et amour : postscript sur les processus interprofessionnels de génération novatrice
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract: Universities Canada, Canada Council, and numerous sources urge the development of creativity and innovation capacity by leveraging broad interdisciplinary approaches, collaboration, and partnerships and networking; however, the relational mechanics of working together on interdisciplinary teams and in combinatory partnerships remain equivocal. Drawing on health care practices of interprofessional education, the authors present three tenets, a currere of team collaboration. They offer eight collaboratively created ekphrastic poems written for a curated international touring printmakers’ art exhibition and use their poetry writing process as a generative learning strategy and example for explaining how to frame a path to authentic collaboration.Keywords: Interdisciplinary research; Poetic inquiry; Ekphrasis; Collaborative research; Interprofessional education; Currere. Résumé : Universités Canada, le Conseil des arts du Canada et plusieurs sources prônent le développement de la créativité et de la capacité d’innovation par le biais de vastes approches interdisciplinaires, de la collaboration, de partenariats et de réseautage. Mais la mécanique relationnelle de la collaboration au sein d’équipes interdisciplinaires et de partenariats combinatoires demeure équivoque. S’inspirant de pratiques d’éducation interprofessionnelle dans le domaine de la santé, les auteurs proposent trois principes fondamentaux et un examen réflexif du travail en équipe. Ils présentent huit poèmes ekphrasiques écrits en collaboration en vue d’une exposition internationale itinérante de graveurs et proposent ce procédé d’écriture de poèmes comme stratégie d’apprentissage générative. Ils utilisent ce processus pour expliquer la façon d’accéder à une véritable collaboration.Mots-clés : recherche interdisciplinaire, questionnement poétique, ekphrasis, recherche concertée, éducation interprofessionnelle, examen réflexif.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.020 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it