MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2917233971 · doi:10.1016/s0828-282x(07)70798-5

The 2007 Canadian Hypertension Education Program recommendations for the management of hypertension: Part 2 – therapy

2007· article· en· W2917233971 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Nadia Khan, Brenda R. Hemmelgarn, Raj Padwal, Pierre Larochelle, Jeff Mahon, Richard Lewanczuk, Finlay A. McAlister, Simon W. Rabkin, Michael D. Hill, Ross D. Feldman, Ernesto L. Schiffrin, Norman R.C. Campbell, Alexander G. Logan, Malcolm Arnold, Gordon W. Moe, Tavis S. Campbell, Alain Milot, James A. Stone, Charlotte Jones, Lawrence A. Leiter, Richard I. Ogilvie, Robert J. Herman, Pavel Hamet, George Fodor, George Carruthers, Bruce F. Culleton, Kevin D. Burns, Marcel Ruzicka, J DECHAMPLAIN, George Pylypchuk, Norm Gledhill, Robert J. Petrella, Jean-Martin Boulanger, Luc Trudeau, Robert A. Hegele, Vincent Woo, Phil McFarlane, Rhian M. Touyz, Sheldon W. Tobe

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Cardiology · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicSodium Intake and Health
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaYork UniversityMcGill UniversityUniversity of OttawaLondon Health Sciences CentreUniversity Health NetworkWestern UniversityUniversity of TorontoUniversity of British ColumbiaMontreal Clinical Research InstituteSt. Michael's HospitalUniversité LavalUniversity of SaskatchewanUniversité de MontréalUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineIntensive care medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.141
Threshold uncertainty score0.283

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.003
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0080.011
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations109
Published2007
Admission routes3
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of CardiologySame topicSodium Intake and HealthFrench-language works237,207