Essential Elements for Advancing Cultural Humility through a Community-Based Physical Therapy Practicum in a Métis Community
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Purpose: This article reveals MPT practicum participant perceptions of the impact that a community-based practicum in a Métis community had on their learning in the area of cultural humility and cultural safety. Method: The impact of this community-based practicum intervention in a Métis community on MPT student education was explored using phenomenological descriptive methodology, with data gathered via exit interviews conducted on completion of the community-based practicum. Concepts of cultural humility and safety from the literature, along with themes emerging from practicum participant interviews, informed the analysis and theme development. Results: Participants’ experiences were categorized into three themes: (1) realizing Métis community strengths; (2) learning from experiences and shaping future practice; and (3) prioritizing relationships. Findings support that participants demonstrated the practice of cultural humility as a result of engaging in the community-based practicum. Conclusions: Our results highlight the importance of (1) community engagement, (2) community-informed practicum design based on strong relationships, (3) a backbone of reflective practice, and (4) a base of community and student readiness to support practicum success. These essential elements support a cultural humility approach to implementing MPT practicums in Indigenous communities, as well as a practice in reconciliation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".