Dynamic properties of a sand–nanoclay composite
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The paper describes the influence of 1–3% (by dry mass of sand) Laponite, a highly plastic synthetic nanoclay, on the dynamic properties of Ottawa sand, based on undrained resonant column tests. The effect of Laponite depends on the amount added, the confining stress and consolidation time. With 1% Laponite, there is an increase in the very small-strain shear stiffness at all confining stresses, which increases with extended consolidation time, reflecting the thixotropic nature of the nanoclay. Added Laponite also produces an increase in small-strain damping, an extension of the linear strain threshold; and it delays the generation of excess pore pressure, degradation of shear modulus and increase in damping with shear strain. These effects, which become more significant with increasing Laponite content, can be attributed to the impact of the clay on the fabric and grain-to-grain contacts. Evidence is provided that Laponite interferes with direct interaction between the sand grains, and the thickness of the clay layer present at the contacts appears to control the small-strain behaviour of the sand–Laponite mixtures. The formation of a gel-like pore fluid from the hydration of Laponite in the voids, and the degree to which it occupies the pore space, are responsible for the behaviour in the non-linear region.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".