MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2917415561 · doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2020.04.515

In situ bypass and extra-anatomic bypass procedures result in similar survival in patients with secondary aortoenteric fistulas

2020· article· en· W2917415561 on OpenAlexaff
Matthew Janko, Karen Woo, Robert I. Hacker, Donald T. Baril, Jonathan Bath, Matthew R. Smeds, Vikram S. Kashyap, Zoltán Szeberin, Gregory A. Magee, Ramsey S. Elsayed, Andrew Wishy, Rebecca St. John, Adam W. Beck, Mark A. Farber, Fernando Motta, Wei Zhou, Gary W. Lemmon, Dawn M. Coleman, Christian‐Alexander Behrendt, Faisal Aziz, James H. Black, William P. Shutze, H. Edward Garrett, Giovanni De Caridi, Christos D. Liapis, George Geroulakos, John D. Kakisis, Konstantinos G. Moulakakis, Stavros K. Kakkos, Hideaki Obara, Grace Wang, Pascal Rhéaume, Victor Davila, Reid A. Ravin, Randall R. DeMartino, Ross Milner, Sherene Shalhub, Jeffrey Jim, Jason Lee, Céline Dubuis, Jean‐Baptiste Ricco, Joseph Coselli, Scott A. LeMaire, Javairiah Fatima, Jennifer Sanford, Winston Bonetti Yoshida, Marc L. Schermerhorn, Matthew Menard, Michael Belkin, Stuart Blackwood, Mark F. Conrad, Linda Wang, Sara Crofts, T. Nixon, Timothy Wu, Roberto Chiesa, Saideep Bose, Jason Turner, Ryan Moore, Justin S. Smith, Rocco G. Ciocca, Jeffrey Hsu, Martin Czerny, Jonathan Cullen, Andrea Kahlberg, Carlo Setacci, Jin Hyun Joh, É. Senneville, Pedro Garrido, Timur P. Sarac, Anthony Rizzo, Michael R. Go, Martin Björck, Hamid Gavali, Anders Wanhainen, Peter F. Lawrence, Jayer Chung

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Vascular Surgery · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInfectious Aortic and Vascular Conditions
Canadian institutionsVancouver General HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAortoenteric fistulaSurgeryAneurysmAbdominal aortic aneurysm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations44
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Vascular SurgerySame topicInfectious Aortic and Vascular ConditionsFrench-language works237,207