MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2917564235 · doi:10.1128/msphere.00598-18

MAP Kinase Regulation of the <i>Candida albicans</i> Pheromone Pathway

2019· article· en· W2917564235 on OpenAlexafffund
Golnaz Rastghalam, Raha Parvizi Omran, Masoumeh Alizadeh, Debrah Fulton, Jaideep Mallick, Malcolm Whiteway

Bibliographic record

VenuemSphere · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicFungal and yeast genetics research
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaGovernment of Canada
KeywordsBiologyKinaseMitogen-activated protein kinaseMating of yeastMatingCell biologyCandida albicansMAPK14Signal transductionSaccharomyces cerevisiaeGeneticsYeastMAP kinase kinase kinaseProtein kinase A

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

MAP kinases and their regulators are critical components of eukaryotic signaling pathways implicated in normal cell behavior as well as abnormal behaviors linked to diseases such as cancer. The mating pathway of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae was central in establishing the MAP kinase paradigm. Here we investigate the mating pathway in a different ascomycete, the fungal pathogen C. albicans . In this dimorphic fungus MAP kinases are also implicated in the mating response, with two MAP kinases apparently playing redundant roles in the mating process. This work establishes that while some level of mating can occur in the presence of a single kinase, the Cek1 kinase is most important for mating, while the Cek2 kinase is involved in adaptation to signaling. While both kinases appear to be themselves regulated by dephosphorylation through the action of the Cpp1 phosphatase, this process appears important for mating only in the case of Cek1.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.063
Threshold uncertainty score0.683

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemSphereSame topicFungal and yeast genetics researchFrench-language works237,207