MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2917567310 · doi:10.2118/0107-0052-jpt

Overview: EOR/IOR (January 2007)

2007· article· en· W2917567310 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Malcolm Pitts

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Petroleum Technology · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPetroleum engineeringOil productionEnhanced oil recoveryOil in placeFlood mythOil fieldEnvironmental scienceOil reservesFlooding (psychology)GeologyPetroleumGeographyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reserves are a key factor for any oil company. This year's EOR issue highlights field projects that increased reserves by use of enhanced oil recovery. Economic incremental-oil production from field projects that used three different technologies [CO2 huff ‘n’ puff, mobility-control polymer, and steam-assisted gravity-drainage (SAGD)] is discussed. Daqing Oilfield Co. Ltd., People's Republic of China, has several papers discussing its commercial polymer flood. An SPE Advanced Technology Workshop on chemical flooding in Daqing concluded with Daqing stating that 25% of its production results from polymer injection—250,000 B/D. One paper stated, "Unquestionably, the application is successful, and the accumulated output has exceeded 70 million tonnes" (more than 500 million bbl of oil). Of interest is a closely spaced pilot to expand the polymer flood to marginal reservoirs. The strategy was injection of different-molecular-weight polymers in a staged manner, from low to high molecular weight, into zones with permeabilities appropriate for the injected polymer. Reported oil rates increased 1.8 times in confined production wells. Ultimate oil recovery beyond waterflood was 11.7%, of which 5.2% resulted from polymer flooding. Sixteen CO2 huff ‘n’ puff projects were conducted on different wells in the Forest Reserve oil field in Trinidad and Tobago over the last 20 years. CO2 from an ammonia plant was injected into either inactive or poor oil producers. Average slug size was 1 MMscf of CO2 per foot of sand, with a 3- to 5-day soak period. Multiple huff ‘n’ puff cycles were effective in more than half the wells, with the second to fourth cycle being the most productive for the majority of wells. Oil-rate improvements from nothing to up to 60 times pre-CO2-injection values were observed. During the startup and early operation of horizontal SAGD wells, it is important to understand the flow distribution of bitumen and water along the horizontal reservoir interval. If this distribution is understood, the distribution of steam, injected either at the heel or toe of the steam injector, can be adjusted to optimize the startup and early operation of the SAGD pair. Total E&P Canada permanently installed optical fiber along its first Joslyn SAGD production well to monitor the temperature profile continuously during startup and production. Thus, good engineering, technology, and a willingness to try different approaches can increase reserves in very large as well as smaller applications. EOR/IOR additional reading available at the SPE eLibrary: www.spe.org SPE 101202 "Study of High-Concentration Polymer Flooding To Further Enhance Oil Recovery" by Yang Fulin, Daqing Oilfield Co. Ltd., et al. SPE 100117 "Application of Smart-Well Technology to the SACROC CO2 EOR Project: A Case Study" by J. Brnak, Kinder Morgan Production Co. LP, et al. SPE 100346 "Suplacu de Barcau Field—A Case History of a Successful In-Situ Combustion Exploitation" by A. Panait-Patica, Petrom S.A., et al.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.327
Threshold uncertainty score0.960

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0040.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3270.349

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Petroleum TechnologySame topicReservoir Engineering and Simulation MethodsFrench-language works237,207