Uniqueness of poroelastic and viscoelastic nonlinear inversion MR elastography at low frequencies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Intrinsic actuation MR elastography (IA-MRE) exploits natural pulsations of the brain as a motion source to estimate mechanical property maps. The low frequency motion of IA-MRE introduces new considerations for inversion algorithms relative to traditional external actuation MRE. Specifically, inertial forces become very small, which leaves low frequency viscoelastic inversions with a non-unique scalar multiplier. Biphasic poroelastic inversions include additional fluid-solid interaction forces to balance the elastic forces, which avoids the non-uniqueness. Analyzing the convergence behavior from different starting values using 1 Hz simulated data, IA-MRE data from a gelatin phantom and in vivo brain IA-MRE data reveal that higher frequency (50 Hz) viscoelastic inversion reaches the correct, unique solution regardless of initial property estimate; whereas, low frequency viscoelastic inversion recovers relative values of shear modulus. In the presence of measurement noise, the non-unique scalar multiplier is determined by the softest material reaching the prescribed lower bound on shear modulus. Poroelastic inversion produces a unique solution at both 50 Hz and 1 Hz; however, hydraulic conductivity must be known or accurately estimated in order to recover quantitatively accurate shear modulus maps at low frequency.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".