Pengaruh Pendekatan Saintifik dalam Strategi Pembelajaran Thinking Aloud Pair Problem Solving (TAPPS) untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Fisika Siswa Kelas X SMA Negeri 08 Palu
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstrak _Penelitian ini dilatarbelakangi oleh rendahnya kemampuan pemecahan masalah fisika siswa SMA. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui pengaruh pendekatan saintifik menggunakan strategi pembelajaran TAPPS untuk meningkatkan kemampuan pemecahan masalah fisika siswa. Metode penelitian yaitu kuasi eksperimen dengan desain “the equivalen, pretest-postest design”. Populasi penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas X SMA Negeri 8 Palu tahun ajaran 2017/2018. Pemilihan sampel adalah siswa kelas X IPA 1 dan X IPA 2. Data penelitian diperoleh melalui tes kemampuan pemecahan masalah siswa dan lembar observasi. Berdasarkan analisis data, diperoleh sampel yang terdistribusi normal dan homogen. Dilakukan pengujian hipotesis dengan taraf signifikan dan diperoleh hasil Tes akhir, thitung> ttabel atau 3,15 > 1,68 hal ini berarti H0 ditolak dan H1 diterima, jadi hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat pengaruh pembelajaran dengan pendekatan saintifik menggunakan strategi Thinking Aloud Pair Problem Solving (TAPPS) untuk meningkatkan kemampuan pemecahan masalah fisika siswa. Kata Kunci: pendekatan saintifik, strategi thinking aloud pair problem solving, kemampuan pemecahan masalah fisika.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.044 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".