Partners in Education, Health, and Safety: Development and Implementation of Concussion Policy in Ontario School Boards
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In March 2014, the Ontario Ministry of Education was the first ministry in Canada to institute a formal concussion policy. The ministry stipulates that student long-term health and safety are essential preconditions for learning, and that concussions can negatively impact cognitive, physical, emotional, and social development. Policy/Program Memorandum (PPM) No. 158 requires all school boards and school authorities to establish a policy on concussions. Each school board in Ontario developed a concussion policy within their local context to address concussion awareness, prevention, identification, management, and training. School boards, administrators, teachers, staff, students, parents/guardians, volunteers, and community-based organizations were encouraged to participate in policy development as stated in PPM No. 158.\nThe purpose of this study was to understand how school boards in Ontario interpreted PPM No. 158 in the development and implementation of board concussion policies and administrative procedures. An interpretive policy analysis founded on Gadamer’s philosophical hermeneutics was conducted on publicly available concussion policy documents and related administrative procedures from 64 Ontario school boards and school authorities. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with four school board administrators to further contextualize this analysis.\nSchool boards in Ontario relied on partnerships across the domains of education, health, and safety in order to fulfill the requirements of PPM No. 158. Within each domain, collaboration between students, parents/guardians, teachers, administrators, coaches, and health care providers was essential for the development and implementation of school board concussion policies. Multiple stakeholder groups frequently share responsibility for student education, health, and safety. Effective collaborative partnerships require strong communication and a shared understanding of concussion prevention, identification, and management strategies. As a result of PPM No. 158, teachers and school administrators have increasingly taken on a leadership role in this regard.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.030 | 0.042 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.025 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.010 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".