MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2918517022 · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2019.01.010

Missense Variants in the Histone Acetyltransferase Complex Component Gene TRRAP Cause Autism and Syndromic Intellectual Disability

2019· article· en· W2918517022 on OpenAlexafffund
Benjamin Cogné, Sophie Ehresmann, Éliane Beauregard‐Lacroix, Justine Rousseau, Thomas Besnard, Thomas X. Garcia, Slavé Petrovski, Shiri Avni, Kirsty McWalter, Patrick R. Blackburn, Stephan Sanders, Kévin Uguen, Jacqueline Harris, Julie S. Cohen, Moira Blyth, Anna Lehman, Jonathan Berg, Mindy Li, Usha Kini, Shelagh Joss, Charlotte von der Lippe, Christopher T. Gordon, Jennifer B. Humberson, Laurie Robak, Daryl A. Scott, V. Reid Sutton, Cara Skraban, Jennifer J. Johnston, Annapurna Poduri, Magnus Nordenskjöld, Vandana Shashi, Erica H. Gerkes, Ernie M.H.F. Bongers, Christian Gilissen, Yuri A. Zárate, Malin Kvarnung, Kevin P. Lally, Peggy Kulch, Brina Daniels, Andrés Hernández, Nicholas Stong, Julie McGaughran, Kyle Retterer, Kristian Tveten, Jennifer A. Sullivan, Madeleine R. Geisheker, Asbjørg Stray‐Pedersen, Jennifer Tarpinian, Eric W. Klee, Julie C. Sapp, Jacob Zyskind, Øystein L. Holla, Emma Bedoukian, Francesca Filippini, Anne Guimier, Arnaud Picard, Øyvind L. Busk, Jaya Punetha, Rolph Pfundt, Anna Lindstrand, Ann Nordgren, Fayth M. Kalb, Megha Desai, Ashley H. Ebanks, Shalini N. Jhangiani, Tammie Dewan, Zeynep Coban‐Akdemir, Aida Telegrafi, Elaine H. Zackai, Amber Begtrup, Xiaofei Song, Annick Toutain, Ingrid M. Wentzensen, Sylvie Odent, Dominique Bonneau, Xénia Latypova, Wallid Deb, Sylvia Redon, Frédéric Bilan, Marine Legendre, Caitlin Troyer, Kerri Whitlock, Oana Caluseriu, Marine I. Murphree, Pavel N. Pichurin, Katherine Agre, Ralitza H. Gavrilova, Tuula Rinne, Meredith Park, Catherine Shain, Erin L. Heinzen, Rui Xiao, Jeanne Amiel, Stanislas Lyonnet, Bertrand Isidor, Leslie G. Biesecker, Dan Lowenstein, Jennifer E. Posey, Anne‐Sophie Denommé‐Pichon, Claude Férec, Xiang‐Jiao Yang, Jill A. Rosenfeld, Brigitte Gilbert‐Dussardier, Séverine Audebert‐Bellanger, Richard Redon, Holly A.F. Stessman, Christoffer Nellåker, Yaping Yang, James R. Lupski, David B. Goldstein, Evan E. Eichler, François V. Bolduc, Stéphane Bezieau, Sébastien Küry, Philippe M. Campeau

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Human Genetics · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Canadian institutionsWomen and Children’s Health Research InstituteMcGill UniversityUniversity of British ColumbiaMcGill University Health CentreUniversity of AlbertaUniversité de MontréalCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
FundersEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentNational Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeNational Institute of General Medical SciencesNational Human Genome Research InstituteNational Institute of Mental HealthNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCenter for Individualized Medicine, Mayo ClinicNational Institutes of HealthGénome QuébecGenome British ColumbiaChildren's Hospital FoundationBaylor-Hopkins Center for Mendelian GenomicsKids Brain Health NetworkFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéBC Children's HospitalBC Children’s Hospital FoundationMcGill UniversityMinistère des Affaires Sociales et de la SantéJohns Hopkins UniversityMedical Research CouncilMayo Clinic
KeywordsGeneticsBiologyMissense mutationIntellectual disabilityPhenotypeGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations55
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueThe American Journal of Human GeneticsSame topicGenetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersFrench-language works237,207