MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2918745131 · doi:10.4095/313670

Origin of boron-rich fluids in the formation of unconformity associated deposits of the Sibley Basin

2019· report· en· W2918745131 on OpenAlexaff
C J Kelly, W J Davis, E G Potter, R T Metsaranta, Mark Puumala

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Studies and Exploration
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUnconformityGeologyGeochemistryStructural basinBoronMineralogyPaleontologyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hydrothermal magnesio-foitite or dravite (tourmaline) is common within the ore zones of unconformity associated uranium deposits globally. Magnesium-rich tourmaline ranging in composition from dravite to magnesio-foitite is identified in two uranium showings within the Sibley Basin. Hydrothermal dravite from the Malborne Lake showing (delta-11B = -22.5 permille to -20.2 permille) is significantly isotopically lighter than dravite and magnesio-foitite analyzed from the Innis Lake showing (delta-11B = 16.5-20.0 permille). The isotopically light delta-11B values of tourmaline from Malborne Lake is consistent with local metamorphic tourmaline, indicating that boron is primarily basement-derived. This contrasts with the isotopically heavy compositions of hydrothermal tourmaline from the Innis Lake showing that are comparable to values reported from the Athabasca Basin. A positive delta-11B value indicates that boron was sourced from, or potentially equilibrated with, the overlying marine evaporites, such as the chemical sediments of the Sibley Basin. The delta-11B values of hydrothermal tourmaline from the two occurrences are markedly different and suggest that vein-hosted mineralization in the basement rocks of the Sibley Basin did not form via a unique mechanism.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.155
Threshold uncertainty score0.982

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological Studies and ExplorationFrench-language works237,207