MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2918769103 · doi:10.1097/hp.0000000000001036

Model of Steady-state Temperature Rise in Multilayer Tissues Due to Narrow-beam Millimeter-wave Radiofrequency Field Exposure

2019· article· en· W2918769103 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueHealth Physics · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicElectromagnetic Fields and Biological Effects
Canadian institutionsHealth Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExtremely high frequencyField (mathematics)Beam (structure)Materials scienceMillimeterOpticsSteady state (chemistry)OptoelectronicsEnvironmental sciencePhysicsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The assessment of health effects due to localized exposures from radiofrequency fields is facilitated by characterizing the steady-state, surface temperature rise in tissue. A closed-form analytical model was developed that relates the steady-state, surface temperature rise in multilayer planar tissues as a function of the spatial-peak power density and beam dimensions of an incident millimeter wave. Model data was derived from finite-difference solutions of the Pennes bioheat transfer equation for both normal-incidence plane waves and for narrow, circularly symmetric beams with Gaussian intensity distribution on the surface. Monte Carlo techniques were employed by representing tissue layer thicknesses at different body sites as statistical distributions compiled from human data found in the literature. The finite-difference solutions were validated against analytical solutions of the bioheat equation for the plane wave case and against a narrow-beam solution performed using a commercial multiphysics simulation package. In both cases, agreement was within 1-2%. For a given frequency, the resulting analytical model has four input parameters, two of which are deterministic, describing the level of exposure (i.e., the spatial-peak power density and beam width). The remaining two are stochastic quantities, extracted from the Monte Carlo analyses. The analytical model is composed of relatively simple functions that can be programmed in a spreadsheet. Demonstration of the analytical model is provided in two examples: the calculation of spatial-peak power density vs. beam width that produces a predefined maximum steady-state surface temperature, and the performance evaluation of various proposed spatial-averaging areas for the incident power density.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.585

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it