MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2918775888 · doi:10.1289/isee.2013.p-1-22-09

Environmental phthalates exposure during pregnancy

2013· article· en· W2918775888 on OpenAlexaffabout
Katia Isabelle Sokoloff, Maryse F. Bouchard, William D. Fraser

Bibliographic record

VenueISEE Conference Abstracts · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEffects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPregnancyEnvironmental healthPhthalateEnvironmental scienceMedicineChemistryBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background. A large scientific litterature exists reporting facts and hypothesis about relation between some infant morbidity or dysfunctions, and perinatal exposure to external stress factors including chemical contaminants. Among these, phtalates are known for their endocrine disruption effects while hormone levels are essentials to maintain pregnancy and ensure fetus development. Their wide use in consumer products explain their environmental and human matrix ubiquity. Aims. Verify phthalates exposure levels in pregnant women and identify their sources. Methods. Data are provided by MIREC study (Maternal Infant Research on Environmental Chemicals 2008-2012) where 2000 pregnant women were followed in 10 canadian centres. Eleven urinary metabolites (MBP, MBzP, MCHP, MCPP, MOP, MEHHP, MEHP, MEOHP, MEP, MMP, MNP) from eight phtalates (BNP, BBzP, DCHP, DOP, DEHP, DEP, DMP, DNIP) have been measured during first pregnancy trimester. Results. Detection limit (LOD) varies among phtalates (0,2 à 0,7 ?g/L). Samples proportions > LOD are : 100% for MBP, MEOHP and MEP, 99% for MBzP and MEHHP, 98% for MEHP, and 85% for MCPP. Highest median urinary concentrations, magnitude from 30 to 1 ?g/L, are from DEHP, DEP, DBzP, and DOP : MEP, MBP, MEHHP, MEOHP, MBzP, MEHP, and MCPP. The one from MMP, MCHP, MNP and MOP were not determined because less than 15% of samples were > LOD. A priori identified sources in litterature for DEHP, DEP, DBzP, and DOP are : fragrances, PVC flexible products, deodorants, hair prays and moss and gel, shampoo, soap, nail polish, body lotions, printer ink, and insecticides. Conclusions. Phthalates level measured in canadian pregnant women are generally lower than reported in north america. Knowledge of sources and exposure levels associated with adverse effects will allow to lower pregnancy exposure with appropriate regulation considering fetus health. Identifying high exposure risk groups will be usefull for targeted intervention to ensure infant health.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.052

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueISEE Conference AbstractsSame topicEffects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicalsFrench-language works237,207