MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2919111299 · doi:10.1149/ma2018-02/58/2132

Improving the Cycling Stability of Sodium Metal Electrode By Making an Sodium-Carbon Composite Electrode

2018· article· en· W2919111299 on OpenAlexaff
Yun‐Jung Kim, Hee-Tak Kim

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Battery Technologies Research
Canadian institutionsKootenay Association for Science & Technology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnodeElectrochemistryElectrolyteMaterials scienceLithium (medication)Plating (geology)Battery (electricity)ElectrodeMetalSodiumChemical engineeringNanotechnologyChemistryMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The use of metallic anodes such as lithium and sodium has attracted large attention in the battery field because of their extremely high specific capacity and low operation potential. Indeed, the formation of metal dendrite upon repeated electrochemical plating/stripping cycling was early identified as obstacle of the development of safe metal anode secondary batteries. Also, due to dendrite formation, the low cycle efficiency and unstable cycle life happen, which hinder their practical application as anode materials. Therefore, to suppress the growth of metal dendrite is one of the most critical issues from a practical view point. Recently, lithium metal has been extensively researched as anode candidate for secondary batteries due to its lowest redox potential and highest specific capacity among metallic anodes. Despite these promising properties, lithium sources are relatively limited and unevenly distributed across the globe, which lead to high costs of lithium metal batteries. Therefore, inevitably, lithium-based batteries will become unaffordable and large-scale production will falter. Therefore, sodium (Na) is one of the promising alternatives to lithium for energy storage technologies because of its relatively high theoretical specific capacity of 1166 mAh g-1 and natural abundance. Also, it has comparable redox potential, that is -2.70 V vs. SHE. However, like lithium metal anode, inhomogeneous electrochemical deposition of Na is a crucial problem that have to be solved for the usage of sodium metal as anode safely. Furthermore, Na metal has extremely high reactivity with liquid organic electrolyte, so high interfacial resistance could be induced due to continuous electrolyte decomposition during battery cycling, which also leads to earlier cell failure. In this research, we present a stabilized sodium electrode by introducing electrically connected carbon network (ECN) to a bulk Na electrode with a simple folding & rolling method. As a results of introducing ECN, we observed that a cell overpotential was decreased as the amount of ECN inside bulk Na metal was increased. Also, we found that the cycling stability of Na/Na symmetric cell with ECN was almost 4.5 times increased compared to bare Na/Na cell, which is consistent with the results of EIS during cycling. By using SEM and CA analysis, we confirmed that an introduced ECN could act as not only an electrical network but also artificial uniform seed for Na nucleation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting Abstracts→Same topicAdvanced Battery Technologies Research→French-language works237,207→