MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2919303497 · doi:10.1109/tvt.2019.2902014

Multicell Massive MIMO: Downlink Rate Analysis With Linear Processing Under Ricean Fading

2019· article· en· W2919303497 on OpenAlexaff
Si‐Nian Jin, Dian‐Wu Yue, Ha H. Nguyen

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersFundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
KeywordsTelecommunications linkFadingMIMOChannel state informationChannel (broadcasting)Signal-to-noise ratio (imaging)BeamformingTransmitter power outputComputer scienceTransmission (telecommunications)Spectral efficiencyMathematicsElectronic engineeringAlgorithmControl theory (sociology)TelecommunicationsEngineeringTransmitterWireless

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper investigates the downlink (DL) rate of multicell massive multiuser multiple-input and multiple-output systems over Ricean fading channels that takes into account channel estimation errors. To acquire channel state information at all users, beamforming training (BT) is examined. Considering both maximum-ratio transmission (MRT) and zero forcing, this paper derives closed-form expressions on the lower bound of the achievable rates for two cases, with or without BT. With the obtained expressions, Bernoulli's inequality is invoked to find the ranges for the length of DL pilots such that the sum spectral efficiency of the scheme with BT is superior to that of the scheme without BT, and vice versa. Various power scaling laws concerning DL data and pilot transmit powers and uplink pilot transmit power are analyzed. Numerical results corroborate the accuracy of the closed-form expressions. In particular, the results show that employing BT with MRT processing is only preferred in environments having a high signal-to-noise ratio, low mobility, and small Ricean K-factors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular TechnologySame topicAdvanced MIMO Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207