MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2919470342 · doi:10.1080/14772019.2019.1570569

Permian spiriferellid brachiopods from northern Pangaea: taxonomy, biostratigraphy, macroevolution and implications for palaeoenvironmental and palaeobiogeographical reconstructions

2019· article· en· W2919470342 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sangmin Lee, G.R. Shi, Jusun Woo, Tae‐Yoon S. Park, Jae-Ryong Oh, Na Kyung Kim, Hans Arne Nakrem, Jun-ichi Tazawa

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Systematic Palaeontology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAustralian Research Council
KeywordsPangaeaPaleontologyPermianBiostratigraphyTaxonCrinoidTaxonomy (biology)BiologyRange (aeronautics)GeologyEcologyStructural basin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study reports diverse spiriferellid brachiopods from the Permian rocks of Svalbard and adjacent areas (Arctic Canada and Subpolar Urals of Russia) located at the northern margin of Pangaea. In total, 11 brachiopod species in four genera are recognized and described in detail, including two new species (Spiriferella protodraschei and Arcullina? enokiani). According to our taxonomic investigation, morphological characteristics of the ventral sulcus and dorsal fold are relatively stable within each species, in spite of considerable intraspecific variations in shell outline and macro-ornamentation. In addition, both the arrangement of pustules, as a shell surface micro-ornamentation, and the development of delthyrial coverings are shown to be significant features for inferring phylogenetic relationships and for defining species. The best-known but still questionable taxon, Spiriferella keilhavii, is here identified as an endemic species restricted to Bjørnøya and, possibly, to central East Greenland; it is phylogenetically closest to S. loveni. Following the taxonomic revision, the stratigraphical ranges of the spiriferellids within the Kapp Starostin Formation in Spitsbergen are fully refined: three species, S. protodraschei, A. polaris and Timaniella wilczeki, are confined to the lowermost Vøringen Member (late Artinskian–early Kungurian), whereas S. loveni dominates the overlying members with a much longer stratigraphical range (late Kungurian–Lopingian?). This abrupt compositional change, along with comparable changes in other taxonomic groups, can be explained by a palaeoclimatic shift from cool to cold conditions between the Vøringen Member and the overlying Svenskeegga member. A similar biotic transition is identified between the Hambergfjellet and Miseryfjellet formations in Bjørnøya. On the other hand, S. loveni is abundant in the Late Permian strata of central East Greenland, but there it appears to be more costate in plication compared to its counterpart from Spitsbergen. It is suggested that this alteration in shell ornamentation may represent a possible response (adaptation) to warming arising from the southward migration of the species.http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:85B863D2-DB42-4835-940A-2DE852C82178

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Systematic PalaeontologySame topicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of FossilsFrench-language works237,207