MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2919505079 · doi:10.1016/j.gecco.2019.e00572

Experimental test of assisted migration for conservation of locally range-restricted plants in Alberta, Canada

2019· article· en· W2919505079 on OpenAlex
Yuzhuo Wang, Jennine L.M. Pedersen, S. Ellen Macdonald, Scott E. Nielsen, Jian Zhang

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueGlobal Ecology and Conservation · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSpecies Distribution and Climate Change
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAlberta Innovates Bio SolutionsAlberta Agriculture and ForestryAlberta Biodiversity Monitoring InstituteClimate Change and Emissions Management Corporation
KeywordsRange (aeronautics)GeographyTest (biology)EcologyAgroforestryBiologyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Given projected rates of climate change, species with limited dispersal may be unable to migrate at the pace necessary to maintain their current climate niches. This could lead to increased risk of extirpation or extinction, especially for locally range-restricted species within fragmented landscapes. Assisted migration has been suggested as a proactive conservation tool to mitigate these risks. We tested assisted migration for Liatris ligulistylis and Houstonia longifolia, two perennial forbs considered ‘vulnerable’ and ‘imperilled’, respectively, in Alberta, Canada, where they are at their northern and western range limits. Both mature plants and seeds were translocated to replicate sites at four geographic locations along a north-south gradient representing the current ranges of the species (central) and areas south (warmer) and north (cooler) of their current range. L. ligulistylis adult plants thrived ∼500 km north of the species current range with survival, growth, and flowering similar to or exceeding performance in the current range, the influence of soil was also tested by comparing the performance of transplanted mature plants in soil from the source location versus the translocation (recipient) site. Plants planted into soil from the source location had increased flower bud production at all sites. Seedling establishment was significantly higher at sites north of the current range, but much lower in the southern locations. These results suggest that L. ligulistylis is in climate disequilibrium, potentially due to migration lags, and that it might be vulnerable to near-future climate vulnerability. For H. longifolia, the influence of flower morph type and location were tested. Only 8 out 130 translocated adult plants survived, five with thrum flowers and three with pin flowers; no seedling establishment was observed in the first growing season, which experienced drier than normal conditions. Among the eight adult plants, seven survived in the central location and one in the north demonstrating specific habitat requirements and conditions that may make this species difficult for translocation and establishment. Overall, locally rare and range-restricted plants with limited dispersal demonstrate climate sensitivity to current conditions and potential for assisted migration, yet species-by-species testing is needed to understand vulnerability and efficacy of this approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.459
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it