New Technique for Cryoneuroablation of the Proximal Greater Occipital Nerve
Bibliographic record
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: Description of a new technique. OBJECTIVES: To describe a safe ultrasound (US)-guided cryoneuroablation technique of the proximal greater occipital nerve (GON). BACKGROUND: Cryoneuroablation is a treatment option for occipital neuralgia, providing more sustained relief when steroid injections fail. US can identify the proximal GON between the C2 spinous and C1 transverse process over the inferior oblique capitis muscle (IOCM), where the GON is clearly visualized. US-guided GON injections are often performed with an out-of-plane approach; however, that approach is difficult with cryoneuroablation, because the probe has no opening (prohibiting hydrodissection), and the size and dullness of the probe hinders easy manipulation. SETTING: University-based outpatient pain clinic. METHODS: We provide a description of the procedure based on experience in the authors' clinic. With the patient in the prone position, the US probe is placed parallel to the IOCM. The GON is seen on top of the IOCM; a midline 2-mm incision allows access to the bilateral GONs with a single skin entry. Using an in-plane approach, the cryo probe is advanced to the nerve in a medial-to-lateral direction, with constant US visualization, staying far away from the spinal cord and vertebral artery, which increases safety. CONCLUSIONS: Based on anecdotal evidence from the authors' clinic, cryoneuroablation of the proximal GON can be performed safely at the level of the IOCM. LIMITATIONS: The procedure described is based on anecdotal evidence from a small number of patients; however, the procedure is promising and formal study is warranted.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".