The Phenomenon of Bullying: A Case Study of Jordanian Schools at Tafila
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of this research was to investigate the phenomenon of bullying and the dangerous effects on victims and thesecurity of school environment, and to understand the psycho-social dimensions, through recognizing the degree ofcontribution of embodying the social values, feeling inferiority and strength of inner feeling of bullies who try tocompensate some difficulties and get social and psychic giants in Tafila Public Schools south Jordan. The sample ofthe study was consisted 300 male and female bullies students at the high-primary stage in the academic year2009/2010 in 8th, 9th and 10th grades. The researcher developed three scales for the purpose of this study: bullyingscale, bullying measure developed for this study: social values scale feeling inferiority scale and the conscienceawakening scale. Means and SDs, ANNOVA and the Chaffee test were utilized in this study. Results indicated thatthe variable of feeling inferior was the strongest factor for predicting bullying and Awakening of conscience andsocial values were found to have a negative relationship with bullying. In addition, it was shown that male studentsare more practiced in bullying than female students and there were statistically significant differences among themeans of students performance in (8th – 10th grades) in bullying only, where no statistically significant differencesindicated among the three levels of grades in social values, feeling interior and awakening of conscience.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".