MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2920184167 · doi:10.1109/tcsii.2019.2903101

Mantissa-Exponent-Based Tone Mapping for Wide Dynamic Range Image Sensors

2019· article· en· W2920184167 on OpenAlexaff
Jie Yang, Ulian Shahnovich, Orly Yadid-Pecht

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Circuits & Systems II Express Briefs · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCCD and CMOS Imaging Sensors
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTone mappingPixelComputer scienceHigh dynamic rangeDynamic rangeLuminanceHistogramComputer visionRange (aeronautics)Image processingAlgorithmTone (literature)Image (mathematics)ExponentArtificial intelligenceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The dynamic range of a scene is defined as the ratio between the maximum and minimum luminance in it. Wide dynamic range (WDR) means this ratio is so large that it exceeds the dynamic range of a traditional image sensor. Nowadays, WDR image sensors enable the capture of WDR scenes. However, the captured WDR image requires an additional tone mapping step to compress the high bit pixel of WDR image to low rate pixel so that it can be displayed on the screen. The tone mapping algorithm is mostly done in an image signal processor or with a specific software application. This brief proposes a tone mapping technique that is suitable for direct processing of the output of a WDR image sensor bitstream. The algorithm acquires statistics on the mantissa and exponent parts of the pixel value and then generates a refined histogram for tone mapping. Experiments that evaluate the image quality and hardware efficiency are carried out. The results indicate that the proposed mantissa exponent-based algorithm provides visually pleasing results and preserves details of the original WDR image better than other similar algorithms. The hardware resources’ efficiency of the algorithm makes the system on chip implementation possible.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Circuits & Systems II Express BriefsSame topicCCD and CMOS Imaging SensorsFrench-language works237,207