Feminismo em pauta: um estudo sobre mulheres e jornalismo alternativo
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This PhD thesis analyzes the feminine theme in the area of alternative journalism based on the dialogue between the different fields of communication, journalism and gender studies in Brazil. The research seeks to describe a historical panorama of Brazilian publications, comparing the changes and the evolution of the media, presenting examples of the valorization and emancipation of women within the sociological and historical perspectives. Further, based on journalistic publications, the political-social impact of events and factors that have led to the linking of women with national alternative journalism is highlighted. In order to deepen the understanding of the data, the study interviews collaborators of Patrcia Galvo Institute -Media and Rights (IPG) and also the Nucleus of Gender Studies -Pagu (NEG-Pagu), mostly using the methodological framework of oral history. The alternative segment is understood as a first historical sketch that makes it possible to understand the trajectory of feminism at different times, drawing the relations between gender studies and society. The conclusion is that, above all, it is through the alternative channels that feminism is inserted in Brazilian journalism.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.020 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".